More is more, less is less, less is more, but then again, more is less

11 years, 2 months ago 12

Being in the Superdome all week and seeing the players come and go, I was reminded again just how big these guys are!  A typical tackle on an NFL team is somewhere around 6′ 4″ tall and the average weight is around 310 pounds. Why so big?  Because the opposing players are just a big!! You won’t see any 5′ 9″ 165 pound tackles in pro football, because they couldn’t get the job done!   You need what it takes to get the job done!!!!!

 

 

So in photography the question is; “What is the job??!!”

 

 

I think you can break down what we do, and how we approach our photography in three catagories;

 

 

Work for hire.  You must compete, must succeed, the best, or nothing!!!  Do you want to eat, live under a roof, and support a family?  You are making a living or important extra income with this, and it’s serious, it’s work, it’s a job, and their are others out there that want your share of the pie you have to fight to keep your slice!

 

Satisfy your Pixel Peeper Obsessions?  Details are the most important thing to you!  Noise, resolution, dynamic range, D Max, shutter accuracy, frames per second, buffer size, shutter lag, auto focus speed at 10 below zero!!!  You look at every image and 100% and 200% crop factors, you read every test report, you know exactly what the dimensions of a pixel is in any camera, you know what pixel density means, you care and worry about pixel pitch, and micro lenses.  You how may aspherical elements and low dispersion elements you have in each of your lenses and you know exactly what f stops diffraction starts and in what amounts.

 

Girls just wanna have fun! Boys too! You shoot for fun, for the sheer joy of being out there, holding a camera in your hands, finding something that trips your trigger to shoot!!  You do this for the sheer Joy of it!!!!!  You love the sound of a camera firing, can’t wait to see it on the LCD!!! You care about quality, but you are more interested in making the statement, and having a blast!!!!  Photography is a passion for you……

 

We’re all a combination of the three, or at least two of the three:

 

You will have to decide what your percentages are.   Currently, ( because a person evolving, is always a moving target!!!).  I’m probably  20% work, 20% Pixel Peeper, and 60% For Fun!  Warning, if you know you’re more than 90% Pixel Peeper!  You’re not a photographer but a scientist!  Don’t get me wrong, it’s ok to be a tech freak, just don’t think that it has a lot to do with actually making photographs!

 

So if you want to make great images,  this experiment is for you!

 

First things first!   This entry will not offer conclusions, only information to allow you to make your own conclusions!  I learned some valuable things as it relates to me, you will have to take what I share and see how it applies to you!  I will share my personal conclusions for my own work.

 

Here are the full details of the experiment.  I went out to the French Quarter during the last hour of daylight and into the early evening.  I took two cameras; a Nikon D600 outfitted with the 24-85 AF-S VR f 3.5.4.5, no tripod, no polarizers.  I set that camera on Auto ISO with a high end limit of 3,200 and a minimum shutter of 1/125th.  Why the D600, it is, in my humble opinion, the best all round Nikon DSLR.  At 24.3 mega pixels it has plenty of resolution, it has very low noise at Hi ISO and it has wonderful ergonomics and sounds an shoots so sweet!  The other camera was the Fuji X10 premium compact camera.  The X10 has something that few other compact cameras have, a zoom lens that goes from 28mm @ f 2 to 112 mm @ f 2.8.  It is built like a tank and has the feel and style of the early Leicas.  For an old guy like me it just feels right.  One last great feature is a 2/3 inch (larger than the typical 1/1.7 sensors) which yields lower high ISO noise and better resolution.  I have, and use many of Nikon’s great compact cameras like the P7100, P7700, and the Nikon 1 V and J series, but this one just suits my style of shooting.  The X10 was set on auto ISO with a high end of 1600 (the practical limit of it’s noise capabilities), and it sets the shutter speed based on lens focal length, which normally works fine. The Fuji has Optical Image Stabilization as well.

 

The mission was as follows, walk, look, find things I liked and, in most cases, hand hold a frame or two with each camera, with approx. the same compositions.  Then process with minimal correcting for color and compare, so let’s get at it!

 

*** To see each example panel larger and more clearly simply clock on it.

 

 

So what did I learn?  Here are some observations, you need to draw your own conclusions, though I will share some of my own just for the record:

 

1.  The D600 is very, very capable of tack sharp imaging,even hand held in poor light.  With the exception of the D800, I’ve never seen sharper images from any of my Nikons!  I also find it outstanding to operate!

 

2.  The X10 is also capable of tack sharp results, but it struggles more as the light goes down.

 

3.  The color of each camera has it’s own tendencies and the user will have to work with the menus to dial in the kind of color they prefer, X10 is warmer out the box, D600 tends to be more neutral or cooler.

 

4.  For just walking around, relaxing, the X10 sure is nice and light, and is hardly noticed by your subject, great for candids.

 

5.  The D600 is not a heavy camera, but, it is not as comfortable for long walks as the little X10.

 

6.  While the X10 is capable of making stunning images, it is not match for the D600 in terms of resolution, and low noise at Higher ISOs!

 

7.  If you put both cameras on a steady tripod, which I have done, though not on this trip, they both make very sharp images, the D600 still is far superior when the ISO goes above 800.

 

* Caveat:  You know whether you are a DSLR person, or a rangefinder/Mirror less kind of shooter, or maybe you are comfortable with either, but this will be the deciding factor in what you will enjoy using in the field and will also decide just how good you can perform with your camera of choice!

 

My personal conclusions:

 

A.  Weight matters.  If you are going to be walking around and carrying all you need to shoot, you want the lightest and most capable camera that you can use.  The X10, Nikon J2 and V2, P7700 and many others are great when weight is key.  You can make wonderful images with all of them, you just have to know what their limitations are, and live within those boundries.  If I was looking for a light weight DSLR, I would start with the D7000 or D90.  Both are very capable and with a small lens system can do fantastic work without a bulging, back breaking bag or pack!  The 16-85 AF-S VR lens is one of my favorites for it’s light weight and sharpness.

 

B. When all out quality matters, and weight is not a de-terming factor. The D600 and D800/800e are as good as it gets.  All three cameras can make files that have almost no limits to what they can do.  The D600 proved that here in New Orleans.  Obviously, the fast and tough D4 is the choice for sports and photojournalism pros.  One other note, buy fewer, but better lenses, always buy the sharpest, highest quality, lenses you an afford, it will pay major dividends in your files!

 

C. For fun shooting is paramount, and all out quality, can take one small step back. Go for a light compact camera, and just treat it like a real camera!  Use a mini or small tripod, or carefully brace the camera for slower shutter speeds, and it will reward you with wonderful images and a back that doesn’t ache near as much!

 

D.  I am leaning toward the following kind of systems;   For serious work where I don’t mind carrying more gear, I think a D800 and D600 with the 16-35 AF-S VR, 24-120 AF-S VR, and the 70-300 AF-S VR would be my three lens stable (I’m thinking hard about replacing the 70-300 with the new and wonderful 70-200 AF-S VR f4 lens).  I always provide myself with a way to do close-up and that could be a 105 Micro, 200 Micro or Diopters, or sometimes automatic extension tubes.

 

E.  When I really want to get away from it all, but still want to be prepared to capture images of a high order!    I am now more prone to consider one of the many great choices in the Mirror less camera arena.  The Nikon 1 series of the J2 and V2  (also the older J1 and V1) joined by the P7700, and P7100 and the X1o tested here all are great cameras that can give you wonderful results with the a little extra care!

 

F.  So, hopefully as I head into the sunset from Nikon in July, I will have two main bags packed, one light and one a little heavier, but both prepared to help me make the images I’m so looking forward to making in the years to come!  Hope some of this information helps you work on you own conclusions!

 

One last note, while it would appear the D600, took top honors, don’t think you can’t do well with the great current crop of compact cameras, these two parting shots really show of the possibilities of the smaller cameras!

 

Great shooting and blessings from,

 

the pilgrim

 

 

 

12 Responses

  1. Doug says:

    Bill: I just returned from Israel where I used a Nikon V2 exclusively. The weight factor was the big issue for me because I’m recovering from some back problems. Normally, I shoot a D7000 with an 18-200 and 70-300 which, though not real heavy, is much heavier than the V2. The V2 performed really well. Adequate quality and, in good light, very good quality. Amazing autofocus and buffer. Terrific metering. Simple to use. Would love ability to auto-bracket for HDR and wish I could use my SB-400, but overall a really nice camera. And so easy to carry on the many long treks we took. Particularly enjoyed the 18.5mm f1.8 lens. Very sharp and kept ISO under control. If Nikon adds a macro and long lens, that would seal it for me. I could easily make the V2 my full-time camera. My next experiment…Buy the FT-1 and try out the 70-300 (now 189-810) as my birding lens.

    • I have to jump in here and ask about the FT-1 – I didn’t know about this adapter. Just confirming – Will it work with my Nikon D7000 and my 70-300mm for bird photography? If yes, then this is exactly what I’m looking for. Bill I’d love your take on this. And Doug, I’d love more of your thoughts on this as well.

      • Okay – I’m replying to myself – reading further – I guess it’s for the V1. I’d love something like this for my Nikon D7000 and 70-300mm lens.

      • admin says:

        No, the FT-1 is for the V and J cameras which have a 2.7 lens factor like your D7000 has a 1.5 factor, sure would be nice though!

        • Bill, that means my 70-300mm lens at 300mm is really 450mm on my Nikon D7000 (1.5 factor) – is that correct?

          • Joshua Boldt says:

            Yes, your D7000 with a 300mm lens would show essentially the same composition as a full frame camera like the D800 with a 450mm lens. In a way you get more bang for your buck with a crop factor camera like the D7000 when it comes to long focal lengths. If you put your lens on Bill’s D800 you would think you were getting a wider shot (not zoomed in as far) if you were both standing in the same spot. (All things not being equal, other factors might allow Bill to then crop in further than you on a bird and possibly still end up with a better picture, but I digress.)

    • admin says:

      I aggressively we really got it right on the V2! The FT-1 is really great to get double use out of your regular Nikkor glass!

  2. Doug says:

    Bill: I’m really tempted by the prospect of the V2 + FT-1 + the new 70-200 F4 with tripod collar. Basically, that’d be a 190-540mm F4 weighing a little over two pounds. This would be awesome for my annual trip to Zambia and Botswana. What a great safari setup!

    Of course, since I already have the 70-300, I’ll start with that. But the lack of a rotating tripod collar for this setup is a bit problematic for me. I do love the idea of 810mm though!

    • admin says:

      Doug, In Africa you will be shooting off a bean bag on the roof of your vehicle so a tripod collar won’t be much help anyway! Check out Marc Alberhasky’s blog, IMAGEMA, He shot some killer stuff in Africa with a similar set up.

  3. Doug says:

    Bill: Thanks for the tip about Marc’s blog. Great stuff! Where I safari in Botswana, the vehicles are open so no beanbag is possible. Truthfully, as I think about it, handheld works best so the tripod collar issue won’t figure in there. Still like the idea for general photography, though. Or maybe I just want to buy a new lens!