Things change…….

10 years, 4 months ago 10

It’s amazing how much things change over time.  I had a conversation today with a dear photographer friend who will remain un-named.  I will tell you this, if I did give you his name, you would find extremely familiar!  Anyway we talked about a number of things but one was the move that is happening in the photo market place.  As a good part of the photo community is aging and the need for smaller and lighter equipment is becoming more prevalent.  As had been my experience, a number of other longtime DSLR  shooters have “had” to make a lighter choice!  Now deciding to make that kind of a change, is not an easy choice, in fact the many people I’ve talked to, that have made that change, did it with a great deal of trepidation.  Why such angst?

 

First of all, many, in fact, most of the shooters out there my age, or anywhere close to it, have either been Nikon or Canon shooters.  When you use a brand of camera for over 40 years you may develop pretty serious attachments.  I certainly did, and I’ve heard the same story from a good number of others.  No matter how much you love something if you can’t carry it, it doesn’t matter.  I’m saying this because as my friend said on the phone today, it’s pretty hard to walk down a different road.  I don’t mean to drag you guys into this hand wringing, but it’s going on with more folks than you might think!   Nikon and Canon, and in fairness Leica, have been the far and away choices to serious photographers.  If you were a sports shooter, or needed a rugged, weatherproof camera you are going to be a Nikon or Canon shooter.  If you want the most expensive and highly craft, essentially hand made camera in the world, with extraordinary glass, you probably already own a Leica!

 

That’s all well and fine, but if you’re a photographer and those are no longer viable options, (because of size and weight), what do you do?   It’s not simple, as a lifelong Nikon shooter I enjoyed wonderful sensors, great glass, and very well engineered, rugged,  bodies.  I’m not saying that because I used to work for Nikon, I’m saying it from the heart.

 

As they say, the water flows under the bridge and as you look back the bridge is disappearing as you head on downstream.  Now let me brag on my solution!  I had only three “requirements” as I looked for a replacement system; (1) The best image quality I could get, (2) a system that had the build quality and ease of use I was accustomed to, and (3)  Really sharp , well made lenses, that covered the needs I had in terms of speed and focal length range.

 

So how has the Fuji X System met those needs?

 

ONE:  Image quality.  The X bodies with the X-Trans Sensor have much better than adequate resolution being 16 mega pixel, APS-C size.   Because the sensors are larger than many smaller system cameras, the noise is extremely low, even at 6400 ISO.  Fuji color is simply magical, the best I’ve ever experienced and their unique feature allowing three files all of different color palettes or monochrome, makes image making much more productive!  While the D800 certainly was the detail king, but for me, I seldom needed that much resolution, and these smaller files are a joy to work with!  I have to say, I’m thrilled with the image quality of the Fuji X System cameras.  (I own the X-Pro1, the X-E2, and the X100s and these comments area true of  all three).

 

TWO Build Quality & Ease of Use.  The Fuji bodies are very, very well built, and have taken some hard use in stride!  I would not say, however,  they are in a league with the heavy built Nikons and Canons, or Leicas.  The other area that I’m slightly concerned with is that they are not sealed against water. While I have shot in rain and snow, I’ve protected them,  and had no problems.  Truthfully if it is raining I’m usually enjoying a cold beverage, waiting for it to stop!  One part of the build that I am very excited about is the retro design which returns all the major controls; Aperture, Shutter Speed knob and Exposure Compensation to places I’m used to finding them, and comfortable working with!!!!!!  I simply love the design!

 

THREE Lens Quality.  This was my greatest fear, because I honestly believed that no one, and I do mean no one made glass as good as my beloved Nikkors.  Time out, Canon makes some lenses that are just stellar, so does Olympus, Panasonic, Sony, and all the other manufacturers, but I have always felt that, lens for lens, Nikkors are the best.  *(Yes, for you Leicaphiles, Leica lenses are stellar, and stupid expensive, and cover a pathetically small range, but I’ll give it to you that the quality is amazing!)  I have to be honest the Fujinon glass was my most wonderful surprise.  I was well aware of the long prestigious history of Fujinon glass used in the television, (video and film), and big format cameras, but these lenses designed for the new X system are simply stunning glass.  I own the 14mm, 23mm, 35mm, 18-55, 60mm Micro (used in the image at the top), and the 55-200.  Several more are coming in early 2014, and I already have them on order!  These lenses are great!   And my current set gives me 21mm to 300mm coverage almost without gaps!!!

 

So, to sum all this up, I still feel a little guilty, but my back and shoulder never hurts from trying to carry too much heavy gear, and my images are getting better all the time, because I’m having a lot more fun!

 

Merry Christmas,

 

the pilgrim

 

Photo Note:  Fuji X-E2, 60mm Micro lens f22 @ 2.2 seconds, lit with a portable LED light. Common kitchens soda straws, held together with a rubber band!

 

Couple of other shots from a trip out today!  Fuji X-E2 with the 23mm (35mm equiv,) f 1.4 lens

 

 

Fine dining in Corbin!

 

 

 

 

 

10 Responses

  1. Joshua Boldt says:

    Great explanation.
    Reminds me of a few others like Zach Arias who are saying similar things (I think you already mentioned Zach’s blog about it once).

  2. Alistair McNaughton says:

    Excuse my ignorance but can you use any of your Nikkor lenses on your Fuji body?

    • the pilgrim says:

      You bet! With adapters many other lenses will work. You loose auto focus, but manual focus works great! My good friend Jack Graham,, a wonderful shooter, rarely uses autofocus!

      • Linda says:

        hey there and thank you in your information ? I’ve ctairenly picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise several technical issues the usage of this site, as I skilled to reload the site many instances previous to I could get it to load properly. I have been brooding about in case your web hosting is OK? No longer that I am complaining, however slow loading circumstances occasions will very frequently impact your placement in google and could harm your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I am including this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for a lot extra of your respective exciting content. Make sure you replace this once more very soon..

  3. Eric W says:

    Thanks Bill for showing me the cameras at Old Car City. The difference in weight and size is great. So far the only thing holding picture quality back is me. In a few years I am certain the tech will allow the system to even handle the normal Daddy assignments at baseball and recitals. So until then I still have a DSLR for those tasks. Other than that… I can’t get better image quality unless I spin all the way up to the latest full frame cameras. Since I don’t do commercial work, I’m pretty well set!

  4. Johnny Boyd says:

    Bill another great article and excellent explanation of the mirrorless dilemma I find myself in thanks to the likes of you , Rob Sheppard and others.

    As I am siting here typing this out, today is the day I have to make a decision, well not really but Olympus has a crazy sale offer that is tempting beyond tempt. Camera and 2 lenses for $499. Not the Olympus body I would want but a great price to enter the mirrorless and see if it is for me before I sale / trade my D600 and my 2.8 lenses.

    My concern is the the 4/3 sensor size compared to the APS-C sized sensor and it makes it even harder after I looked at some 13 x 19 sized prints the Oly sales rep (at Precision Cameras yearly show they put on) had showing the same scene shot with a 7100 and a D600 using the 24-70 2.8. Then cropped an area and it was printed at a 8 x 10 or so and I was amazed as to my 50 year old eye the Oly M-1 was better than the 7100 and ALMOST as good as the D600. But, I always find it hard to trust those salesman (except you) and their printed image portfolio books.

    I love the ability of being able to use different lenses from different companies and using them with full function on the camera body.

    Have you flown with your little camera in your little plane and shot any photos?

    Bet, you feel the difference……. Maybe a little photo book from a little plane shot with a little camera could become Part 3 of 500 feet.

    Any hoot, Bill, I hope you and your family have a Merry Christmas and a wonderful New Year.

    Uh oh , gotta go ……. I think the NSA is at my door because I used the word Christmas and not Holiday.

  5. Stanley Leary says:

    Bill i have trusted your opinion for more than 30 years. You and Frank Miller (Snake) impacted a lot of my techinical gear through the years. I wrote to you to double check with you a couple of weeks ago before buying the Fuji X E2. I agree with all your assesment.

    Love it in the studio as well.

    Thanks for you honest assesment. I think I may have re-ignited those creative juices with this camera.