{"id":17049,"date":"2016-03-23T15:08:03","date_gmt":"2016-03-23T15:08:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/?p=17049"},"modified":"2016-03-23T18:06:05","modified_gmt":"2016-03-23T18:06:05","slug":"3-week-user-review-of-the-fuji-x-pro-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/?p=17049","title":{"rendered":"3 Week User Review – Fuji X PRO 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Almost 6,000 miles, 55 giga-bytes of images, over a hundred locations or photographic spots, all add up to a good test of the New Generation<\/span> Fuji X PRO 2! \u00a0There are tons of reports that go over every feature, and they are numerous and wonderful, but I wanted to give you a photographer’s hands on, extended shoot, evaluation of this wonderful instrument. \u00a0First let me apologize to the Nikon F5 film camera, it was rightly<\/span><\/strong> called “A Picture Making Machine”<\/span><\/strong> and in it’s day, it surely was, today I’m deeming the new X PRO 2, (and it’s associated internal parts), the current “Picture Making Machine!” \u00a0When you consider what else is out there on the market that is an unbelievable statement, so let me back it up.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Let’s start with the other contenders; the Nikon D810, the Canon EOS 5DS, and the Sony Alpha a 7RII. \u00a0Why these three? \u00a0Medium format is out of the reach of most photographers, ($$$), While the Panasonic and Olympus make some wonderful cameras and lenses, the 4\/3rd sensor limits ultimate quality, especially at high ISO. To service all our needs, an APS-C or full 35mm size sensor is needed. \u00a0These three cameras are supported with a full range of optics (except for Sony – which is slowly getting up to speed on lenses, not there yet.) \u00a0All of these are well made, with excellent sensors and of very high resolution catagory. \u00a0So the battle is set.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The single most important factor, (for me), in any camera is IMAGE QUALITY. \u00a0Image Quality is the combination of color quality, sharpness, gradation, and the lack of objectionable noise at higher ISO settings. Fort he record the new X-Trans CMOS sensor in the X PRO 2 is great our to 6400 and beyond!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The image above is my evidence of why the X PRO 2 stands out against the competition. \u00a0The image above at a motorcycle museum is shot at ISO 800 even at a higher ISO, the gradation on the red fender is amazing! \u00a0Gradation is tone to tone smoothness, in the words the red fender has the feel of the tonal texture (smoothness). \u00a0This is a factor that in high enough resolution shows minute changes in tone. \u00a0In detail, noise, gradation and color quality (admittedly this one is an individual thing, I love Fuji color). \u00a0I declare the X PRO 2 the winner. \u00a0(o.k. you got me, I did not shoot this scene side by side with all four.) \u00a0I am very aware of the quality of all these cameras, and I know that the X PRO 2 \u00a0does not take a back seat to any of them in these qualities, so why is it the winner? \u00a0For me two things; \u00a01. the color quality<\/strong><\/span> (remember that Fuji offers a bewildering choice of film simulations that are very handy, including Acros monochrome with several different filters, add to that you can, in jpeg, shoot any three every push of the shutter release. ), and 2. \u00a0Price<\/strong><\/span>; \u00a0Sony $3,198. Nikon $2,796., Canon $3,599. \u00a0to the Fuji X PRO 2’s \u00a0$1,698. \u00a0in other words you could buy a pair of the X PRO 2 bodies for the price of one of the others! \u00a0Twice the reliability!!!!! \u00a0Seriously, a second body is a back up!!!!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Had to show this image, just sells my color prejudice or Fuji X cameras! \u00a0Factor two; Lenses.<\/span><\/strong> \u00a0Nikon and Canon have a very large selection of pro quality glass with some very specialized lenses. \u00a0If you need those highly specialized lenses and are willing to carry large full frame capable lenses then Canon or Nikon might win the battle for you. \u00a0Sony is woefully behind the parade on the number and types of lenses available at this time. \u00a0Fuji has a secret weapon, not only are there lenses a very complete set of the 95% most used focal lengths and zooms, but there quality is second to none. \u00a0The Fuji lenses are mostly solid metal construction, smaller and lighter and faster than almost any competing lens for Nikon and Canon or Sony. \u00a0They also feature the most effective Optical Image Stabilization of any brand, hand down. \u00a0The image below was shot by a shaky 70 year old man, hand held at 1\/60th of a second, it Fuji’s new 100-400 f 4.5-5.6 zoom @ 400 (600mm equivalent!!!!)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Enough said!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Next we need to look at functionality in the shooting situation. \u00a0For many years we all shot DSLRs (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras. \u00a0With a \u00a0DSLR you look through a prism to a mirror and through the lens, seeing exactly what the sensor will see, but not what the final image will look like. \u00a0A DSLR does not take into account any user settings, like white balance, color quality, sharpening or exposure compensation , unless you are using the back camera’s LCD which is a video image. \u00a0The view through the eye level viewfinder in a mirror less camera is alway a video image that shows all the above information about the final image, in other words what you see is “truly” what \u00a0you get, and I find this trumps all the other except Sony which is mirrorless as well. \u00a0Another very important fact is mirrorless cameras allow the viewing of real time depth of field in a viewfinder that does not darken, as you stop down the aperture you simply see the increasing depth!!!! \u00a0Winner Fuji and Sony!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Another factor favoring the mirror less cameras is that the video image is still clear to see in low light conditions. \u00a0The video image is amplified making composing easier as in the image above at pre dawn. Advantage Fuji & Sony.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The two images above illustrate more than all the statistics why I love the Fuji X System, it is a shooter’s camera, it feels right in the hands, substantial but not too big and heavy, the lenses are tack sharp, the OIS works almost magically allowing an old man to go back to and hand held shooting for the first time in decades. \u00a0The Acros monochrome (above is stunningly beautiful) and Nikon, Canon and Sony have nothing that can touch it or create the rich color of Velvia film simulation! \u00a0It costs less, Fuji offers more affordable, incredibly sharp fast single focal length and zoom lenses! \u00a0The new 100-400 (equiv. to a 150-600) is take tack sharp and has magical OIS and is under two grand!!!!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

If all this were not enough, the X-T2 will surely come later this year with all this magic for and more for those that prefers a DSLR style body with all the advantages of mirror less.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Fuji has brought us the best of all worlds in this ground breaking, “Picture Making Machine!!”<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Blessings,<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

the pilgrim<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Now I need to go back to the pool, hot tub and my bride!!!!!!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Almost 6,000 miles, 55 giga-bytes of images, over a hundred locations or photographic spots, all add up to a good test of the New Generation Fuji X PRO 2! \u00a0There are tons of reports that go over every feature, and they are numerous and wonderful, but I wanted to give you a photographer’s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chronicles"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17049"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17065,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17049\/revisions\/17065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}