

{"id":7049,"date":"2012-12-08T21:13:39","date_gmt":"2012-12-08T21:13:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/?p=7049"},"modified":"2012-12-08T23:24:57","modified_gmt":"2012-12-08T23:24:57","slug":"the-big-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/?p=7049","title":{"rendered":"The Big Test!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1.jpg\" rel=\"lightbox[7049]\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-7050\" title=\"The Trio\" src=\"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"522\" height=\"498\" srcset=\"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1.jpg 522w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1-150x143.jpg 150w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1-270x257.jpg 270w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1-314x300.jpg 314w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1-400x381.jpg 400w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1-345x330.jpg 345w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/The-Trio1-500x477.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 522px) 100vw, 522px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>When I got home last night from pro calls in Knoxville, I found a box from the UPS guy! \u00a0It was the long awaited new Nikon 70-200 AF-S VR f4 lens (above far right). \u00a0 I&#8217;ve really been interested in the lens because it would complete my f4 series of Nikon&#8217;s top zooms of that speed range. \u00a0 I wanted to wring it out and had a bunch of other lenses I wanted to compare it to. \u00a0So I took the following lenses and shot one of my favorite Christmas decorations our on the back deck.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>First why do this????!!! \u00a0I was not worried about Nikon making a bad lens, and I wasn&#8217;t expecting any surprises but I have a personal philosophy that goes like this, Test your cameras and lenses and once you know they \u00a0are capable of making well exposed, tack sharp images, with accurate color, you will know when that&#8217;s not what you are getting, who is at fault!!!! \u00a0If I know my gear is capable, the only thing left to do, is make sure my technique is a good as my gear!! \u00a0The way to improve is to set standards and then work hard to meet them. \u00a0If you are wondering if it&#8217;s the lens or camera, how will you know when you&#8217;re getting your act together!?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>So I tested the following lenses on a D600, set at ISO 800, and tripod mounted with the VR turned off for those lenses that had VR. \u00a0I used a remote release, the wireless Nikon ML-L3.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">80-200 AF f 2.8 (the old push pull model from the 90&#8217;s)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">70-200 f4 \u00a0Manual Focus ( Last of the great MF push pull zooms from Nikon)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">70-300 AF-S VR G f 4.5-5.6 \u00a0(Current model)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">80-200 Manual Focus f4.5 (the classic 1960&#8217;s and 70&#8217;s lens)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">70-150 f3.5 Series E (made famous by the late Galen Rowell. \u00a0His Rainbow over the temple shot was made with this lens)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">70-210 f4-5.6 AF<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">50-135 f3.5 Manual Focus<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">105 f 2.5 \u00a0Manual Focus (Classic portrait lens from the 70&#8217;s)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">70-300 AF f4.5-5.6 (older push pull model)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">105 Micro Nikkor Manual focus f 2.8 (Set the standard for Micro lenses along with the 55 Micro Nikkor f 2.8)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff9900;\">24-120 AF-S VR G f4 (current and best 24-120 zoom)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This was the target<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E.jpg\" rel=\"lightbox[7049]\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-Blog Post Image wp-image-7051\" title=\"Series E\" src=\"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-580x386.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"580\" height=\"386\" srcset=\"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-580x386.jpg 580w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-270x180.jpg 270w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-960x640.jpg 960w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-600x400.jpg 600w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-880x587.jpg 880w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-350x233.jpg 350w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-400x266.jpg 400w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-370x246.jpg 370w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-500x333.jpg 500w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E-750x500.jpg 750w, https:\/\/billfortney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/Series-E.jpg 1496w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I could pull samples from each lens and publish them here, \u00a0but, \u00a0A. On the web you couldn&#8217;t see the difference between them (no lens was bad), and B. \u00a0You would strain your eyes terribly trying!!!!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Trust me, I just did, so let me tell you how I scored them! \u00a0(purely subjective by the way&#8230;..)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">Best all around:<\/span><\/strong> \u00a0(Ease of use, overall sharpness, speed of focus, quality of construction, and price, plus effectiveness of VR, if it had it).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\"><strong>1. \u00a0The venerable 70-300 AF-S VR G f4.5-5.6.<\/strong><\/span> \u00a0Slightly less sharp than some of the others, but plenty sharp for almost any use. \u00a0Focuses fast, has very good VR ,(not up to the new 70-200 AF-S VR f4 though, it&#8217;s simply insane), Current Holiday price of a little under $400. makes it a steal!!! \u00a0Compact easy to carry, it&#8217;s a winner.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">2. The new 70-200 AF-S VR f4<\/span><\/strong> \u00a0(killer VR, very sharp, almost as good as the sharpest lens tested, very fast focus, very well made, but lost some points on price, but worth it, if you need to shoot handheld and want all the rest!!) \u00a0Slightly bigger than the 70-300 AF-S VR.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\"><strong>3. \u00a0The 80-200 f 4.5 &amp; 80-200 f4 manual focus<\/strong><\/span> classics (the sharpest lenses tested excluding the 105 Micro Nikkor which was our comparison lens. \u00a0Cheap (around $150. for mint ones), still readily available, but no VR, no auto focus, slow to work with, but they render superlative results if you are careful and patient, not so hot for action work.)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">4. \u00a0The 70-210 f4-5.6 AF<\/span><\/strong> was the killer bargain of the bunch, still very available for around $120. to $150 bucks and tack sharp (among the three or four sharpest lenses tested!). \u00a0Auto focus is slow but it will focus very close and is made very well! \u00a0No VR. \u00a0If you happen to own Nikon 5T and 6T diopters they work great with it, and the MF 80-200 f4 as well.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The <span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">24-120<\/span> was just thrown in to see how well it held up, it did very well, but is slightly less sharp than the sharpest lenses tested, but not enough to keep me from using it all the time! \u00a0It is still a very, very sharp lens. \u00a0Remember the comparisons were made at 100% crops<\/p>\n<p>The <strong><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">105 f 2.5<\/span><\/strong> is still one of the best portrait lenses ever made and the 105 Micro Nikkor still will be my 105 Micro lens in the future. \u00a0The <strong><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">50-135<\/span><\/strong> and the <strong><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">70-150 Series E<\/span><\/strong> are both tack sharp, and very useful when you want to carry a small manual focus lens, they held up to their sterling reputations without even sweating. \u00a0They also were tested among the upper half of sharpest lenses. \u00a0I&#8217;m very partial to the 50-135 since I used it to shoot much of my first America From 500 Feet book! \u00a0The print show form that book were 24X36 prints!!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Believe it or not the old <strong><span style=\"color: #3366ff;\">80-200 f 2.8 AF<\/span><\/strong> (not the new current III) was the weakest of them all. \u00a0Why did I not throw in the current <span style=\"color: #3366ff;\"><strong>70-200 AF-S VR f 2.8 III<\/strong><\/span>????? \u00a0I am sure it would have tested right up at the top with the best lenses, but for me, it&#8217;s just to big and heavy to carry around. It is still the preferred lens for photojournalists and sports shooters who need fast focus and f 2.8 speed, and VR, \u00a0that&#8217;s just not me.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The good news is if you have the budget there are some astounding lenses out there to consider, and if you don&#8217;t, there are still great used lenses that perform very well too!! \u00a0Not getting super sharp telephoto shots?? \u00a0It&#8217;s not the lens!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Blessings,<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>the pilgrim<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When I got home last night from pro calls in Knoxville, I found a box from the UPS guy! \u00a0It was the long awaited new Nikon 70-200 AF-S VR f4 lens (above far right). \u00a0 I&#8217;ve really been interested in the lens because it would complete my f4 series of Nikon&#8217;s top zooms of that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chronicles","category-learning"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7049"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7059,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7049\/revisions\/7059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/billfortney.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}