3 Week User Review – Fuji X PRO 2

8 years, 8 months ago 15

 

 

Almost 6,000 miles, 55 giga-bytes of images, over a hundred locations or photographic spots, all add up to a good test of the New Generation Fuji X PRO 2!  There are tons of reports that go over every feature, and they are numerous and wonderful, but I wanted to give you a photographer’s hands on, extended shoot, evaluation of this wonderful instrument.  First let me apologize to the Nikon F5 film camera, it was rightly called “A Picture Making Machine” and in it’s day, it surely was, today I’m deeming the new X PRO 2, (and it’s associated internal parts), the current “Picture Making Machine!”  When you consider what else is out there on the market that is an unbelievable statement, so let me back it up.

 

Let’s start with the other contenders; the Nikon D810, the Canon EOS 5DS, and the Sony Alpha a 7RII.  Why these three?  Medium format is out of the reach of most photographers, ($$$), While the Panasonic and Olympus make some wonderful cameras and lenses, the 4/3rd sensor limits ultimate quality, especially at high ISO. To service all our needs, an APS-C or full 35mm size sensor is needed.  These three cameras are supported with a full range of optics (except for Sony – which is slowly getting up to speed on lenses, not there yet.)  All of these are well made, with excellent sensors and of very high resolution catagory.  So the battle is set.

 

The single most important factor, (for me), in any camera is IMAGE QUALITY.  Image Quality is the combination of color quality, sharpness, gradation, and the lack of objectionable noise at higher ISO settings. Fort he record the new X-Trans CMOS sensor in the X PRO 2 is great our to 6400 and beyond!

 

 

The image above is my evidence of why the X PRO 2 stands out against the competition.  The image above at a motorcycle museum is shot at ISO 800 even at a higher ISO, the gradation on the red fender is amazing!  Gradation is tone to tone smoothness, in the words the red fender has the feel of the tonal texture (smoothness).  This is a factor that in high enough resolution shows minute changes in tone.  In detail, noise, gradation and color quality (admittedly this one is an individual thing, I love Fuji color).  I declare the X PRO 2 the winner.  (o.k. you got me, I did not shoot this scene side by side with all four.)  I am very aware of the quality of all these cameras, and I know that the X PRO 2  does not take a back seat to any of them in these qualities, so why is it the winner?  For me two things;  1. the color quality (remember that Fuji offers a bewildering choice of film simulations that are very handy, including Acros monochrome with several different filters, add to that you can, in jpeg, shoot any three every push of the shutter release. ), and 2.  Price;  Sony $3,198. Nikon $2,796., Canon $3,599.  to the Fuji X PRO 2’s  $1,698.  in other words you could buy a pair of the X PRO 2 bodies for the price of one of the others!  Twice the reliability!!!!!  Seriously, a second body is a back up!!!!

 

 

Had to show this image, just sells my color prejudice or Fuji X cameras!  Factor two; Lenses.  Nikon and Canon have a very large selection of pro quality glass with some very specialized lenses.  If you need those highly specialized lenses and are willing to carry large full frame capable lenses then Canon or Nikon might win the battle for you.  Sony is woefully behind the parade on the number and types of lenses available at this time.  Fuji has a secret weapon, not only are there lenses a very complete set of the 95% most used focal lengths and zooms, but there quality is second to none.  The Fuji lenses are mostly solid metal construction, smaller and lighter and faster than almost any competing lens for Nikon and Canon or Sony.  They also feature the most effective Optical Image Stabilization of any brand, hand down.  The image below was shot by a shaky 70 year old man, hand held at 1/60th of a second, it Fuji’s new 100-400 f 4.5-5.6 zoom @ 400 (600mm equivalent!!!!)

 

 

Enough said!

 

Next we need to look at functionality in the shooting situation.  For many years we all shot DSLRs (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras.  With a  DSLR you look through a prism to a mirror and through the lens, seeing exactly what the sensor will see, but not what the final image will look like.  A DSLR does not take into account any user settings, like white balance, color quality, sharpening or exposure compensation , unless you are using the back camera’s LCD which is a video image.  The view through the eye level viewfinder in a mirror less camera is alway a video image that shows all the above information about the final image, in other words what you see is “truly” what  you get, and I find this trumps all the other except Sony which is mirrorless as well.  Another very important fact is mirrorless cameras allow the viewing of real time depth of field in a viewfinder that does not darken, as you stop down the aperture you simply see the increasing depth!!!!  Winner Fuji and Sony!

 

Another factor favoring the mirror less cameras is that the video image is still clear to see in low light conditions.  The video image is amplified making composing easier as in the image above at pre dawn. Advantage Fuji & Sony.

 

 

 

The two images above illustrate more than all the statistics why I love the Fuji X System, it is a shooter’s camera, it feels right in the hands, substantial but not too big and heavy, the lenses are tack sharp, the OIS works almost magically allowing an old man to go back to and hand held shooting for the first time in decades.  The Acros monochrome (above is stunningly beautiful) and Nikon, Canon and Sony have nothing that can touch it or create the rich color of Velvia film simulation!  It costs less, Fuji offers more affordable, incredibly sharp fast single focal length and zoom lenses!  The new 100-400 (equiv. to a 150-600) is take tack sharp and has magical OIS and is under two grand!!!!

 

If all this were not enough, the X-T2 will surely come later this year with all this magic for and more for those that prefers a DSLR style body with all the advantages of mirror less.

 

Fuji has brought us the best of all worlds in this ground breaking, “Picture Making Machine!!”

 

Blessings,

 

the pilgrim

 

Now I need to go back to the pool, hot tub and my bride!!!!!!

 

 

 

15 Responses

  1. Mike E says:

    First of all you are supposed to be resting!!! Second, don’t be so shy — if you really like the Fuji Pro 2, then tell us. Oh, I guess you did 🙂

    Great to see you so excited about the Fuji line….. it seems like it has brought you back to the joy that is photography!

  2. admin says:

    Mike it certainly has, and that makes me easier to live with for all of you, no matter what you shoot!!!!

    • Peter Gilbert says:

      So I think you used the 18~135 on your recent trip, how well does that match up with the new X-Pro2?

      • admin says:

        It is optically wonderful, you need to use the electronic viewfinder at longer focal lengths, but it balances well!

  3. David W. says:

    <>

    You’re batting 1.000! Enjoy the break.

  4. Jim Erickson says:

    Have been shooting mine for two weeks now. I’m blown away by this camera. I wasn’t sure I’d like the range finder experience but I can tell you it is amazing. Anything that makes you look at things slightly different is good for the end result. I’m amazed though how many say after 56mm that the OPV is worthless. I find that by using the OPV and even my 55-200, and using the little box as a pointing or aiming device and shooting in a continuous burst mode I can now follow the flight of a fast moving bird and get incredible images. If I were to use the EVF for the same image I can’t even find the bird let alone track him. Hope that makes since. Anyway glad I went ahead a got this fabulous piece Fuji equipment. Keep them coming my friend.
    Jim Erickson.

  5. Jim Goshorn says:

    Just got my X-Pro2 and the 100-400 + TC today. I just can’t believe what Fuji puts out. The X-Pro2 is such a hoot to use and that ERF is really cool. Wasn’t sure if the rangefinder would feel right to me but I put the 18-55 on and watched the frame lines adjust to the zoom and I got a big grin.

    Will probably stick with the 18-55 for two reasons: the OIS and the 16-55 would probably block the OVF more. So I’ll sacrifice a little IQ and faster focusing for extra usability. Can’t have everything 🙂

    The 100-400 is so sharp and that OIS is fantastic. 600mm at 1/60 is unbelievably great! Popped on a RRS plate from one of my Canon lenses and I’m good to go.

    All that’s left now is that 120 macro and my Canon gear can be sold.

    Jim

  6. Tim L says:

    Another thought-provoking post, Bill. If I could build the perfect camera for me, I would definitely steal some stuff from Canon and Sony (I don’t know Nikon) but the majority of it would be Fuji for sure. There isn’t another company that has gotten so much right.

    You’ve probably said so before, but what percentage of your shots are JPG vs RAW?

    • Bill Fortney says:

      100% JPEG
      I shoot 3 film simulations all the time: Velvia. – Provia. – Across with Red filte

      • Skip says:

        Are you shooting using JPEGs and Simulation Bracketing, or are those simulations in FINE+RAW?
        BTW, I originally thought to go for the 100-400mm, but assuming it would be rarely used, switched “this year’s” GAS to the X-PRO2 to step up from the X-T10 to WR and 24megs. Love the OVF! Will I eventually go back and pick up the 100-400mm? Yeah… in time. But your 1% seems about right… except when you need that 1%, you have a 100% need.

        Traveling to the UK last summer, I shot the 10-24 for about 85% to 90% for architecture, British gardens, the works. Needed to go longer only a handful of times when I didn’t have time or daylight to hike out where I wanted to get a shot. Then went for the 18-135mm. Fuji’s lens line up makes trading out the hardest thing you can do. And while zooms are handy, when I know what I want to shoot and the conditions, primes let me go a tad more lightweight… which was part of my reason for getting into Fuji anyway. I’m going to try your Think Tank belt shooting approach next weekend as a way to re-inforce that by leaving the bags in the car trunk.

        Great post! Thanks!

  7. […] through Scoop.it from: billfortney.com Fujifilm X-T1 vs X-Pro2: Which Camera Should You Buy? | Laya Gerlock 0 Flares Twitter 0 […]

  8. […] / The Fujifilm X-Pro2 is One Solid and Sexy Camera at petapixel / 3 weeks user review at billfortney / X-Pro2 review at findingrange / Fuji Xpro2 Auto Focus review at thefxworks / New Year, New Camera […]